Denotation of the real referent of the myth: the case of the image of the Aal Luuk Mas world tree
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-4861-2023-4-119-132Keywords:
Aal Luuk Mas tree; myth; metaphorical layer; denotation; attribute; rotation; chaos; model; hierarchical series; analogy; referentAbstract
This work is devoted to the problem of integrating scientific knowledge with the use of systematic methodology in research. The relevance of addressing the problem is due to the insufficient implementation of post-non-classical approaches in modern folklore studies. The level of knowledge of human culture today is increasingly demanding the synthesis of knowledge from different disciplines to expand the boundaries of worldview. The purpose of the study is to update the conceptual foundations of systematic research of mythological texts, and then to identify the real core of the myth of the Aal Luuk Mas world tree in the light of natural science theory. The materials for the analysis are extracted from the epic texts of Olonkho, where the mythological views of the Sakha ancestors are most fully preserved. Scientific novelty is seen in the very formulation of the problem of integrating knowledge and methods in the study of images of the mythological canvas of olonkho texts. The principle of integrity serves as the leading principle in the study, and a systematic approach is implemented. Structural and semantic analysis, the method of mutual interpretation of myth and science, methods of demetaphorization, dehyperbolization of the mythological image are applied. The author clarified that the approach is based on a number of concepts of the scientific paradigm “nature-man-thinking-creation”. It is proposed to introduce into folklore research the consideration of the problems of humanitarianism and myth, and science in the context of the integral field of human culture, which is possible to provide a multidimensional result of research. As a result of the analysis, the content of the ancient image of Aal Luuk Mas appears in a new light, in the form of the most important cosmic process – the spiral dynamics of systems of celestial bodies. It is emphasized that the main cosmic function of the mythological image of the Aal Luuk Mas tree as a driving principle is to ensure the dynamics, integrity and unity of the Universe at all levels of matter (microcosm, macrocosm, and megaworld). The author concludes that the results obtained contribute to the revision and possible adoption of the scientific image of the phenomenon of “spiral motion” in the form of a projection of the “psychological universal and archetype” (S. Yu. Neklyudov) mythological representations of ancient people.
Acknowledgements: The study was carried out as part of the NEFU research project “Epic monument of the Yakut intangible culture: textological, typological, cognitive and historical-comparative aspects”.
References
1. Neklyudov, S. Yu. Field of humanitarian knowledge and strategies for researching folk culture. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie. 2008, no. 10, pp. 11–34. (In Rus.)
2. Neklyudov, S. Yu. Folklore and its research: twentieth century. Ehkologiya kul’tury. 2006, no. 2, pp. 121–127. (In Rus.)
3. Toporov, V. N. The World Tree: Universal Sign Complexes. Vol. 1. Moscow, Handwritten monuments of Ancient Russia Publ., 2010, 448 p. (In Rus.)
4. Losev, A. F. Dialectics of myth. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2001, 559 p. (In Rus.)
5. Nadel-Czerwińska, M. The structure of the Universe (metalinguistic aspects) and the mythological origins of modern science. Lingvokul’turologiya. 2009, no. 3, pp. 170–195. (In Rus.)
6. Neklyudov, S. Yu. Mythological picture of the world. URL: http://postnauka.ru/video/31579 (accessed: October 26, 2023). (In Rus.)
7. Remezova, I. I., Kosarev, A. F. Philosophy of myth: mythology and its heuristic significance. Sotsial’nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 3: Filosofiya: Referativnyi zhurnal. 2002, no. 3, pp. 285–295. (In Rus.)
8. Bart, R. S/Z. Translation by V. P. Murat. Moscow, RIK Kul’tura, Ad Marginem Publ., 1994, 304 p. (In Rus.)
9. Maidanov, A. S. Correlation of mythological and scientific images of reality as a method of their mutual interpretation. Filosofskaya mysl’. 2016, no. 5, pp. 55–86. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.5.18971. (In Rus.)
10. Semenova, L. N. Epic world of Olonkho: spatial and plot structures. Saint Petersburg, Petersburg Oriental Studies Publ., 2006, 232 p. (In Rus.)
11. Dmitrieva, L. V. The image of a sacred tree in the heroic epic of the peoples of Siberia. Traditional Culture. 2011, no. 3, pp. 12–18. (In Rus.)
12. Kuzmina, A. A. Olonkho of the Vilyui region: existence, plot-compositional structure, images. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2014, 160 p. (In Rus.)
13. Popova, G. S. Universal tree Aal luuk Mas in the contemporary culture of the Sakha (Yakut) people. Values and Meanings. 2019, no. 4, pp. 103–120. DOI: 10.24411/2071-6427-2019-10082. (In Rus.)
14. Satanar, M. T. On the semiotic interpretation of the mythological image of the Aal Luuk Mas tree in the Olonkho epic. Oriental Studies. 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1135–1154. DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2020-50-4-1135-1154. (In Rus.)
15. Toporkov, A. L. Folklore in interdisciplinary dialogue. In: Proceedings of the Department of Historical and Philological Sciences of the RAS. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2016, pp. 23–41. (In Rus.)
16. Propp, V. Ya. Folklore and reality. Moscow, Editorial board of Oriental literature Publ., 1976, 324 p. (In Rus.)
17. Shtompel, O. M. Sociocultural essence of natural philosophy. The political conceptology. 2016, no. 4, pp. 20–26. (In Rus.)
18. Rickert, G. Sciences about nature and sciences about culture. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1998, 413 p. (In Rus.)
19. Losev, A. F. Genesis – Name – Space. Edited by A. A. Takho-Godi. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1993, 919 p. (In Rus.)
20. Hubner, K. The Truth of Myth. Translation by I. Kasavin. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1996, 448 p. (In Rus.)
21. Golosovker, Ya. E. Logic of myth. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 218 p. (In Rus.)
22. Cassirer, E. Natural scientific concepts and concepts of culture. Voprosy filosofii. 1995, no. 8, pp. 157–173. (In Rus.)
23. Kosarev, A. F. Philosophy of myth: Mythology and its heuristic significance. Moscow, PER SE Publ.; Saint Petersburg, University Book Publ., 2000, 304 p. (In Rus.)
24. Propp, V. Ya. Morphology of a fairy tale. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969, 168 p. (In Rus.)
25. Meletinsky, E. M. Poetics of myth. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976, 407 p. (In Rus.)
26. Ivanov, V. V. Selected works on semiotics and cultural history. Moscow, Languages of Russian culture Publ., 1999, 912 p. (In Rus.)
27. Jung, K. G. Man and his symbols. Moscow, Silver threads Publ., 2017, 448 p. (In Rus.)
28. Stepin, V. S. Culture. In: New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2010, 636 p. (In Rus.)
29. Lotman, Yu. M. System with one language (Culture and explosion). In: Semiosphere. Culture and explosion. Inside thinking worlds. Articles. Research. Notes. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB Publ., 2000, pp. 14–17. (In Rus.)
30. Neklyudov, S. Yu. Why are the myths of different peoples similar to each other? URL: http://arzamas.academy/materials/123 (accessed: October 18, 2023). (In Rus.)
31. Maidanov, A. S. From a mythical image to a scientific one. Filosofiya nauki. 2010, iss. 15, pp. 248–262. (In Rus.)
32. Korolev, K. M. Encyclopedia of symbols, signs, emblems. Saint Petersburg, Midgard Publ., 2005, 603 p. (In Rus.)
33. Henle, P. Metaphor. In: Language, Thought and Culture. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 1958, 273 p. (In Eng.)
34. Bickerton, D. Introduction to the linguistic theory of metaphor. In: Metaphor theory. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 284–306. (In Rus.)
35. Nyurgun Bootur the Swift: Yakut heroic epic olonkho. Translation by V. V. Derzhavin. Yakutsk, Yakut Book Publ. House, 1975, 430 p. (In Rus.)
36. Oyunsky, P. A. Yakut tale (olonkho), its plot and content. Executive editor V. N. Ivanov. Yakutsk, Saydam Publ., 2016, 120 p. (In Rus.)
37. Shimanchuk, D. V. Modeling of controlled translational-rotational motion of a celestial body in the vicinity of the collierial libration point L. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Applied Mathematics. Computer Science. Control Processes. 2017, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 147–167. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu10.2017.203. (In Rus.)
38. Kyzlasov, V. G. Evolution of the Universe (system analysis). Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy. 2015, no. 10, part 5, pp. 928–937. (In Rus.)
39. Popova, A. S. In the vastness of Olonkho. Yakutsk, Sakhapoligraf Publ., 1995, 128 p. (In Yakut)
40. The hero girl Jyrybina Jyrylyatta: olonkho. Yakutsk, Kemyel Publ., 2019, 508 p. (In Yakut and Rus.)
41. Pokrovsky, M. P. On the hierarchy of natural systems (on the issue of classification of the forms of occurrence of chemical elements in nature). In: Yearbook 2016. Proceedings of the Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural Branch of the RAS. 2017, iss. 164, pp. 308–314. (In Rus.)
42. Penkov, I. I. Earth Sciences. The mysterious behavior of the Earth in orbit. Problemy nauki. 2018, no. 6, pp. 121–126. (In Rus.)
43. Olonkho of Srednekolymsky ulus. Yakutsk, Bichik Publ., 2016, 280 p. (Sakha booturs: in 21 vol., vol. 18). (In Yakut)
44. Satanar, M. T. Semantics of the mythological image of Yuryung Aiyy Toyon in its fundamental principles (based on materials of archaic texts of Olonkho). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021, no. 7, pp. 266–285. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-7-266-285. (In Rus.)
45. Gudimova, S. A. Symbols of cultures: collection of articles. Moscow, INION RAN Publ., 2002, 220 p. (In Rus.)
46. Dal, V. I. Sayings and Bywords of the Russian People: in 2 vol., vol. 1. Moscow, Artistic literature Publ., 1984, 780 p. (In Rus.)
47. Haish, B. Theory of God. Evidence of the existence of God in modern science. Moscow, Sofiya Publ., 2010, 224 p. (In Rus.)
48. Neklyudov, S. Yu. Structure and function of myth. In: Myths and mythology in modern Russia. Moscow, AIRO-XX Publ., 2000, pp. 17–38. (In Rus.)
49. Duguya Bega: olonkho. Executive editor M. T. Satanar. Yakutsk, Alaas Publ., 2023, 249 p. (In Yakut and Rus.)
50. Explanatory dictionary of the Yakut language: in 15 vol., vol. I (Letter A). Edited by P. A. Sleptsov. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2004, 679 p. (In Yakut and Rus.)
51. Gogolev, A. I. Origins of mythology and the traditional calendar of the Yakut. Yakutsk, Publ. House of the Yakut University, 2002, 104 p. (In Rus.)
52. Filippova, V. V., Filippova, S. V. Visualization of folklore text (using the example of Yakut riddles about space). Arktika XXI vek. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2021, no. 4, pp. 69–80. (In Rus.)
53. Yakut folklore. Compilers P. N. Dmitriev, G. V. Popov. Yakutsk, Yakutsk Book Publ., 1986, 132 p. (In Yakut)
54. Satanar, M. T., Illarionov, V. V. Model of the Sakha world: semantics from the perspective of the geometry of forms (based on the material of the Yakut epic). Liberal Arts in Russia. 2018, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 471–481. DOI: 10.15643/libartrus-2018.6.4. (In Rus.)
55. Postolaki, A. I. Spiral shape is a fundamental property of matter in the Universe. Fundamental’nyie i prikladnyie issledovaniya: problemy i rezul’taty. 2013, no. 6, pp. 54–58. (In Rus.)
56. Grishchenko, S. V. Parameters of our Universe and its structural elements. Problemy nauki. 2016, no. 4, pp. 12–24. (In Rus.)
57. Uvarovsky, A. Ya. Single husband: olonkho. In: Recollections. Yakutsk, Bichik Publ., 2003, pp. 123–132. (In Yakut, German and Rus.)
58. Kerlot, H. E. Dictionary of symbols. Moscow, Refl-buk Publ., 1994, 608 p. (In Rus.)
59. Matuzenko, L. I. Synergetics as one of the promising scientific directions. Vestnik TGEU. 2000, no. 2, pp. 21–27. (In Rus.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 EPIC STUDIES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Copyright (c) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.