SOME COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL FEATURES BATYR IN THE EPIC OF THE TATAR PEOPLE

Abstract

The object of the article “Some comparative-typological features Batyr in the epic of the Tatar people” is the image of the main characters in the epic legends of the Tatar people. The epic legends Batyr – is, first of all, a representative of the common people, which symbolizes his secular ideas and aspirations. In another way, this type is called a national hero. Because it is rich in attitudes, political beliefs of the people. Epic environment has characterized the protagonist as an example, the standard imitation of. Tracing the evolution of epic biography of the hero and his heroic deeds in the typological and comparative-historical and typological basis, identifies the leading motives Batyr create an image with a national character. In today eposovedenii concept of “national hero” is used as a charismatic symbol of national identity. Reconstruction of the portrait characteristics of national Batyr goes through obscheepicheskih analysis techniques. Such motives as the miraculous birth, obtaining athletic horse and weapons, magic invulnerability determine the “face” of each of the national hero. Also focuses on the transformation of the role of the protagonist with its functional purpose. Sometimes, the national hero of many different functionality, which is determined by the outcome of the developing events of the epic.

 References

1. Kozin S. A. Dzhangariada: geroicheskaja pojema kalmykov. Vvedenie i izuchenie pamjatnika i perevod torgutskoj ego versii. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1940. – 252 c.
2. Zakirova I. G. Narodnoe tvorchestvo perioda Zolotoj Ordy: mifologicheskie i istoricheskie osnovy: avtoref. diss. … doktora filol. nauk / I. G. Zakirova. – Kazan’, 2011. – 356 s.
3. Urmancheev F. I. Imja jepicheskogo geroja // Sovetskaja tjurkologija. – 1986. – № 4. – S. 22-33.
4. Belinskij V. G. Sochinenija: v 3 t. – T. 2: Stat’i i recenzii (1841-1845). – M.: OGIZ Goslitizdat, 1948. – 932 s.
5. Meletinskij E. M. Proishozhdenie geroicheskogo jeposa. Rannie formy i arhaicheskie pamjatniki. – M.: Izd-vo vostochnoj literatury, 1963. – 475 s.
6. Zhirmunskij V. M. Narodnyj geroicheskij jepos. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskie ocherki. – M.-L., 1962. – 435 s.
7. Propp V. Ja. Russkij geroicheskij jepos. – M.: Labirint, 1999. – 638 s.
8. Lipec R. S. Obraz batyra i ego konja v tjurko-mongol’skom jepose. – M.: Nauka, 1984. – 263 s.
9. Barkova A. L. Raboty po obshhej mifologii: Obraz hromogo kuzneca v mifologii. URL: http://mith.ru (data obrashhenija: 05.10.2015)
10. Tatar halyk dastany. Idegәj. – Kazan, 1994. – 274 b.
11. Ahmetzjanov M. I. Jeho vekov. 2006. – № 2. – B. 173-179; 2007. – № 1. – B. 202-208; 2007. – № 2.
12. Muhametzjanova L. H. Nekotorye voprosy izuchenija “Kaharmana katil”, jepicheskogo dostojanija kazanskih tatar. // Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2013. – № 4 (295). Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 75. – S. 79-81.