SYNTAGMATIC AND PARADIGMATIC STRUCTURES OF JANGGAR THE EPIC: RELEVANT PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS

Authors

  • Tserennadmid NYAMSUREN, nyamsuren@mnums.edu.mn Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Sendenjav DULAM, sosedula@gmail.com Mongolian State University of Arts and Culture, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Baldoo DAGZMAA, dagzmaa@gmail.com National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2018.12.22329

Keywords:

folklore, epic, the Janggar, structure, functions, syntagmatic and paradigmatic analysis, intangible cultural heritage, description of the underworld, awareness of freedom, and desire production.

Abstract

SYNTAGMATIC AND PRAGMATIC STRUCTURES OF JANGGAR THE EPIC: RELEVANT PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS 

Abstract. In this article, we have aimed to define the syntagmatic and paradigmatic structures of Janggar the epic, and propose some relevant philosophical interpretations.

Defining the structures rely primarily upon the methodology described in Morphology of the Folktale by Vladimir Propp, and The Structural Study of Myth by Levi-Strauss. Janggar the epic compiled by T. Dugersuren comes to be main material for the article.

With regard to syntagmatic structure, all functions excluding branding, unfounded claims, difficult task, solution, recognition, and exposure are noticed in Janggar. As regards paradigmatic structure, the first column of the matrix covers episodes such as stealing of horses, attempting to seize the queen or heroes, or harming someone's body, and it is observed that the characteristics of these episodes are connected with difficulties or villainy. The events grouped in the second column deals with releasing, reviving, healing, interceding, assisting in fleeing, protecting, supporting, helping to defeat the enemies, and becoming a child for someone else. These all have common in alleviating difficulties and in indicating the good activities. The third column has something to do with exacting revenge, pursuing, encroaching, and spatial transference whereas the common feature of last one refers to the events like winning, capturing, killing, or beating down.

Legitimating how one responds, and how the ultimate outcomes would be when the accepted relationship or treatment within paradigmatic structure underlying the epic are violated, it exhibits what should be done or preferable in cases of invading or being invaded as exemplary social behaviors, norms and models of living. Moreover, enumerating the belongings or property of main hero in detail in very beginning of epics as usual would express the awareness of liberty, and the value on property for the Mongols. An important feature for epics could be inferred from here. Apart from providing norms or standards and satisfying the criteria of competence, epics produce desires in the society in which they exit. Therefore, coming to be memory or reminder of experienced lives, the epics may seem to belong to the past, but there are always contemporaneous with act of being told again and again in the society in which they are, and produce future hope, aspiration, and desire through the image of heroes carrying the human spirit forward.

References

  1. UNESCO, “Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage”, 2003 [Web resource]. URL: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/convention/ (accessed December 20, 2018).
  2. Propp V. Ya. Morphology of the Folktale. Leningrad, Academia, 1928, 151 p.
  3. Levi-Strauss C. The Structural Study of Myth. In: The Journal of American Folklore. 68, No. 270, Oct.-Dec., 1955, pp. 428-444.
  4. Janggar the Epic. Vol. 1. Ulaanbaatar, S B print, 2012, 348 p. (In Mong. lang.)
  5. Dulam S., Nandinbilig G. Mongol aman zhohiolyn onol. Vol. 1. Ulaanbaatar, Soyombo printing, 2007, 389 p. (In Mong. lang.)
  6. Dulam S. Mongol domog zuin dur, 3rd ed. Ulaanbaatar, Bitpress, 2012, 76 p. 380 p. (In Mong. lang.)
  7. Poetics. London, Penguin Group, 1996, 144 p.
  8. Levi-Strauss C. The Savage Mind. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1966, 310 p.
  9. Locke J. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. P. Laslett, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1960, 464 p.
  10. Arndt A. Hegel, Marx, and Freedom. In: Revista Opinião Filosófica. Vol. 7, No. 1, Fev. 2017 [Web resource]. URL: http://periodico.abavaresco.com.br/index.php/opiniaofilosofica/ article/view/649 (accessed September 16, 2018).
  11. Campbell J. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. California, New World Library, 2008, 418 p.
  12. Lyotard J. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1984, 110 p.
  13. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. New York, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004, 46 p.

Published

28-12-2018

How to Cite

NYAMSUREN, T. ., DULAM, S. ., & DAGZMAA, B. . (2018). SYNTAGMATIC AND PARADIGMATIC STRUCTURES OF JANGGAR THE EPIC: RELEVANT PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS. EPIC STUDIES, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2018.12.22329

Issue

Section

Articles